Mechanistic Tomography: Designed Measurement for Control-Oriented Interpretability
Automated news aggregation. Headlines and summaries are gathered from public feeds; see our editorial standards for sourcing, corrections, and AI-assist disclosure.
arXiv:2608.19338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability seeks quantities that models do not expose directly: represented states, component effects, interactions, and responses to interventions. Patching, gradients, Hessian-vector products, and subset interventions provide different measurements under different access assumptions and may target different quantities. We formulate their shared measurement structure as mechanistic tomography: designed measurement for recovering internal mechanisms and intervention effects. For a chosen basis and intervention family, measurements take the form y = Ax + w, where A describes the interventions, x is the target map, and w contains nonlinear response, sampling error, and basis misspecification. This language gives a practical procedure: start with the least costly measurements, test on held-out interventions at the intended scale, calibrate simple mismatch, and expand the measurement family when structured residuals remain. Control provides a demanding validation setting because an estimate that guides an intervention acts as an observer. In a two-HMM model, control error rises with observer error, while target improvement can hide nuisance-state movement. Under forward-only access, sparse aggregate measurements recover a finite-effect map with fewer interventions than coordinate patching. With gradient access, finite probes improve a local attribution map. Lifted measurements and Hessian-vector products recover interactions missed by first-order maps, while Tracr shows that the required family depends on the basis. On GPT-2-small IOI, the Name Mover-Negative Name Mover interaction is the largest held-out predictive term among three tested cross-group pairs. On Qwen-2.5-7B, finite calibration makes an additive refusal-response map adequate, so held-out error does not support pairwise lifting.
Key takeaways
- 01arXiv:2608.19338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability seeks quantities that models do not expose directly: represented states, component effects, interactions, and responses to interventions.
- 02Patching, gradients, Hessian-vector products, and subset interventions provide different measurements under different access assumptions and may target different quantities.
- 03We formulate their shared measurement structure as mechanistic tomography: designed measurement for recovering internal mechanisms and intervention effects.
About this story
This story was aggregated from arXiv cs.LG. Headlines, summaries, and links are gathered automatically from public RSS feeds for your convenience.
Read the full story →For agents:JSON recordOpenAPIWebMCPllms.txt