AIMode.newsSearch
Live

Section

AI

AI breakthroughs, model releases, research, and industry moves.

Subscribe to this section →
Advertisement
AI

The Evaluation Protocol Determines the Result: An Independent Reproduction of LeWorldModel on TwoRoom

arXiv:2608.10145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LeWorldModel trains a latent world model with a prediction loss and a single anti-collapse regulariser, and reports approximately 87% of goals reached on TwoRoom, its simplest diagnostic environment. We reproduce that result by independent reimplementation on roughly $25 of rented compute, with all evaluation on one laptop CPU. We reach 94.0% at the repository's evaluation goal offset, against 84.0% for the authors' own released checkpoint measured under our protocol on identical episodes, and we reproduce the reported representation result directly (position probe Pearson r = 0.9988 against a reported 0.996). Reaching that point required four conventions that determine the outcome and appear in no released configuration file: dense action gathering across a frameskip block, a programmatically-set action-encoder width, ImageNet pixel normalisation, and action z-scoring. A reproducer following the released configurations alone obtains a model whose predictor cannot converge. The evaluation protocol is itself contested by the released material. The paper's appendix and the repository's configuration specify different goal offsets and step budgets; on the authors' own weights these yield 14.0% and 84.0%, and only the configuration's values reproduce the reported figure. On fifty identical episodes, changing nothing but how the goal is constructed moves that checkpoint from 84.0% to 8.0%. Two findings generalise. One-step prediction accuracy does not predict long-horizon planning success: across three checkpoints spanning a sevenfold range in prediction error, including the authors' own, it orders short-horizon success monotonically and fails to order long-horizon success at all. And a batch normalisation layer inflated our reported validation loss by up to a factor of 300, concealing a training loss that was flat throughout.

arXiv cs.LG ·

AI

Edge Phoneme Recognition for Children's Speech through Age-Aware Training

arXiv:2608.10206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Detecting phonemes from children's speech has historically been difficult due to the scarcity of training data, and unique characteristics of children's speech. During a phoneme detection competition, we found that training a lightweight model to predict the age of the learner, as well as the phoneme sequence, enabled a 94M-parameter model to outperform WavLM Large models (317M) on the target DrivenData distribution, and fall within approximately 0.04 CER of competition ensembles with 90 times the parameters. This has enabled the creation of PhonemeTrainer, an application that can run on most modern cellular phones. This will ultimately enable better Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) and pronunciation helper apps for children's speech, with the privacy and compliance benefits that come with edge processing.

arXiv cs.AI ·

AI

Sheaf-Based Federated Representation Learning

arXiv:2608.10016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous federated systems require agents to learn and exchange informative representations despite differences in data distributions, sensing modalities, model architectures, latent dimensionalities, and local learning objectives. To address this challenge, we propose Sheaf-based Federated Representation Learning (SFRL), a general framework that jointly optimizes local objectives with a manifold-constrained geometric alignment regularizer based on learnable sheaf restriction maps. Unlike most existing approaches, SFRL does not assume a shared global latent space. Instead, global consistency emerges from the alignment of neighboring latent representations through orthogonal transformations and isometric embeddings. This alignment is enforced by a quadratic gluing regularizer induced by the sheaf Laplacian, whose learnable restriction maps adapt the geometry to the observed data. The penalty is evaluated on a small set of shared pilot samples, ensuring scalability and communication efficiency. We develop a decentralized algorithm for solving SFRL, termed Sheaf-FRL, which alternates between gradient updates of the local models and closed-form Procrustes updates of the edge-wise restriction maps. We further establish convergence of Sheaf-FRL to first-order stationary points in both deterministic and stochastic settings. As an application, we consider a cooperative classification task in the context of semantic communication, under model and data heterogeneity. Our results show that Sheaf-FRL outperforms baseline approaches in terms of local and post-communication classification accuracy across different levels of local distribution shift and exhibits greater robustness to latent-space dimensionality compression.

arXiv cs.LG ·

AI

MIDAS: Mutual Information Disentanglement with Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Incomplete Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

arXiv:2608.09986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most existing multimodal sentiment analysis approaches assume access to complete multimodal inputs. However, real-world applications frequently encounter incomplete or corrupted modalities, posing a critical challenge. Although several methods have been proposed to tackle this issue, they mainly rely on data imputation and heuristic coordination constraints, which fail to effectively extract and leverage task-relevant information from the incomplete multimodal data. To address this challenge, we propose a unified framework termed Mutual Information Disentanglement with uncertainty-Aware fuSion (MIDAS), which effectively restructures multimodal representations under incomplete conditions. MIDAS adopts a variational modeling strategy to represent each modality with multivariate Gaussian latent variables and further decomposes them into shared and exclusive factors. To obtain reliable representations, we design a minimax objective that minimizes the mutual information between shared and exclusive spaces for stable disentanglement, while maximizing the mutual information among shared spaces across modalities to enhance semantic alignment. In addition, an uncertainty-aware fusion mechanism is introduced, where posterior variance is leveraged as a reliability indicator to adaptively weight latent features during fusion, ensuring robust integration even when modalities are incomplete. Extensive experiments on three widely used datasets show that MIDAS achieves strong and consistent performance gains over competitive baselines across a wide range of incomplete settings, demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness for incomplete data scenarios.

arXiv cs.AI ·

AI

Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging

arXiv:2608.10126v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aggregates heterogeneous preferences into a single reward model, assuming preference homogeneity. When preferences are heterogeneous, this aggregation induces a procedural fairness failure where majority preference groups dominate reward learning while minority preferences are systematically under-represented. This work defines procedural fairness in alignment as preserving distinct preference signals during reward modeling and shows that standard RLHF violates this via preference averaging. Preference-Aware RLHF (PA-RLHF) is introduced, separating optimization across preference modes at the reward learning stage. In a controlled setting, PA-RLHF improves overall alignment accuracy from 46.9% to 67.9% and reduces the fairness gap between best and worst aligned groups from 15.9 to 9.6 percentage points. These results show that procedural fairness failures in alignment can arise from structural design choices in reward learning, even in controlled, noise-free settings, with direct implications for large language models and agentic systems, where biased reward models can compound inequities across sequential decisions.

arXiv cs.LG ·

AI

Finding the Signal in the Spam: Jointly Learning Rewards and Worker Reliability from Pairwise Comparisons

arXiv:2608.10045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The problem of learning from pairwise comparisons has been widely studied across many domains such as recommendation systems, social choice, and more recently, fine-tuning large language models. In this problem, the goal is to learn item rewards based on pairwise comparisons between them. In many scenarios, these comparisons are elicited from crowdworkers using platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, Scale AI, etc. However, crowdworkers are often unreliable due to limited domain knowledge or revenue-maximizing (spamming) behavior. In this work, our goal is to understand whether worker reliability (competency) can be learned jointly with item rewards. To this end, we adopt the Boltzmann-rational model for pairwise comparisons, which extends the Bradley-Terry-Luce model by incorporating worker competencies. We derive an EM-based algorithm for learning under this model by introducing Polya-Gamma latent variables to transform the logistic likelihood into a conditionally Gaussian form, enabling tractable optimization and leading to a simplified $Q$ function in the E-step of the algorithm. This technique allows us to reduce our formulation to a matrix sensing problem, using which we establish theoretical convergence guarantees for our algorithm. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets. These experiments demonstrate the advantages of using our algorithm over several baselines and confirm its strong robustness to both spammers and adversarial workers, highlighting its practical effectiveness in realistic crowdsourcing and reward learning settings. The code and data is publicly available at https://github.com/KaustubhShejole/BoRa_EM.

arXiv cs.LG ·

AI

Detecting Soft Skills in ML Engineering Roles CVs

arXiv:2608.10046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Soft skills shape collaboration among ML engineers, data scientists, and software engineers building ML-enabled systems, yet what we know about them comes almost entirely from the demand side. Job advertisements, surveys, and hiring manager interviews capture what employers ask for. How candidates themselves articulate these competencies has not been studied, and existing CV-mining work is both keyword-based, so it cannot see skills conveyed through narrative, and descriptive, reporting frequency rankings without testing whether group differences exceed sampling variation. We close both gaps. Using a balanced corpus of 300 curated CVs spanning the three roles, we extract explicitly listed and implicitly narrated soft skills with an LLM-based pipeline validated against a human-annotated ground truth, a distinction that existing extractors were not designed to make. We then convert the demand-side literature's claims into 13 falsifiable hypotheses about role signatures, seniority progression, and disclosure style, and test them with effect sizes under family-wise error control, so that candidate-side data can corroborate or contradict the demand-side account rather than merely illustrate it. Eleven hypotheses are supported, one partially, and one refuted. Candidates disclose soft skills through narrative rather than keyword lists by roughly three to one, and most so for the competencies employers value most: leadership, coordination, and mentoring (88-96% narrative). Seniority nearly triples the odds of articulating leadership. That competency, assumed universal in prior work, is articulated by software engineers at half the rate of their peers. Technical candidates do articulate soft skills, but a keyword-based screening systematically misses them.

arXiv cs.LG ·